Market Snapshot: Coal-Based Carbon Fiber

Acceleration of coal technology – including production of coal-based carbon fiber – is an area of interest under the current presidential administration. This is signaled by President Trump’s Executive Order “Reinvigorating America’s Beautiful Clean Coal Industry” (April 2025), which highlights coal-based carbon fiber as a research and development area alongside other high-performance, high-value coal-to-carbon products like coal-derived graphite. It is also implied by the energy and water development appropriations bill passed by the House in early September 2025, which proposes $688 million for DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management (FECM) or Office of Fossil Energy (FE). Alongside critical minerals and materials technology, coal and carbon utilization is a focus for FE under its Minerals Sustainability program.

The global carbon fiber market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 7.2% over the next five years, from $4.82 billion USD in 2025 to $6.82 billion in 2030, according to MarketsandMarkets. Widespread adoption of carbon fiber in the aerospace, defense, and wind energy industries continues to drive growth, as does increasing demand for lightweight, high-strength materials in the automotive, sporting goods, and construction industries. Most carbon fiber – about 90-95% – is made from polyacrylonitrile (PAN), a synthetic organic polymer resin also widely used to make acrylic fabrics. Pitch-based carbon fiber, made from petroleum or coal tar, accounts for about 4-5% of the overall carbon fiber market by value in 2025, . Coal tar pitch is obtained by distilling coal tar, a byproduct of coal coking, primarily carried out in steelmaking.

While today’s market for pitch-based carbon fibers (CFs) is relatively small, pitch-based CFs are attractive because they can offer higher rigidity and electrical and thermal conductivity than PAN-based CFs. They also offer higher carbon yield using cheaper precursors, so they have the potential to be cheaper, although PAN-based CF’s more mature manufacturing techniques can mean it is cheaper to produce at scale. Compared to petroleum pitch-based CF, coal-based CF is generally lower in tensile strength but also has a lower precursor cost, higher carbon yield, higher electrical and thermal conductivity, and is simpler to manufacture. Challenges remain, however, before coal-based CF can be produced cost-competitively at scale. Natural impurities in coal greatly affect the attributes of the resulting CF, and manufacturing improvements are needed to address variability in the source coal and pitch composition and determine processing control requirements. (For more information, see DOE publications on coal-based CF on OSTI.gov.)

Given the abundance and relatively low cost of coal in the U.S., Giraud-Carrier and Barlow (2022) point out that coal tar pitch is a carbon fiber precursor candidate that could reduce reliance on foreign suppliers while helping coal-producing communities continue to cope with the decline in domestic consumption of coal as fuel. Carbon fiber can even be produced from waste coal, left over from ongoing and legacy coal processing. The University of Kentucky Center for Applied Energy Research (CAER) announced the development of such a method in 2023 under the $10 million C4WARD: Coal Conversion for Carbon Fibers and Composites project, in collaboration with DOE FE and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory and its Carbon Fiber Technology Facility.

Top global manufacturers of carbon fiber in general include Hexcel Corp. (U.S.), Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corp. (Japan), Teijin Ltd. (Japan), Toray Industries Inc. (Japan), and Zhongfu Shenying Carbon Fiber Co. Ltd. (China). For coal tar pitch-based carbon fiber specifically, there are a handful of key, vertically integrated players, including Mitsubishi Chemical Group Corp. (Japan), Nippon Graphite Fiber Corp. (Japan) – an affiliate of Nippon Steel Chemical & Material (Japan), and Osaka Gas Chemical Co. Ltd. (Japan). Mitsubishi Chemical’s DIALEAD, Nippon Graphite’s GRANOC, and Osaka Gas Chemical’s DONACARBO are coal tar pitch-based carbon fibers used for aerospace, sports, and industrial applications, among others.

To learn more about innovations in coal-based carbon fiber and other coal-to-carbon technologies, consider checking out the American Carbon Society’s Carbon 2026 Conference, to be held July 12-17, 2026 in Charleston, SC.

Share this article:

Email
X
LinkedIn

Click below to learn about our market research services

Stay in the Know with Dawnbreaker®

Receive valuable industry insights such as our Market Snapshots, SBIR/STTR & TABA updates, & webinar announcements.

Fusion Energy Overview

Fusion is a potential energy source and occurs when one or more lighter elements combine to form a heavier element, releasing energy in the process. [1] Devices designed to harness this energy are known as fusion reactors. [2]   A future fusion plant could use the heat produced by the fusion reaction to produce steam to drive turbines or generators that produce electricity. [3] For almost a century, scientists around the globe have been looking to recreate and harness the power of fusion energy. [4]  

Tokamak
Source: ITER

There are two commonly pursued technologies to create and control plasma. Magnetic confinement uses strong magnets to contain plasma. A widely used configuration known as a tokamak[5] uses powerful magnets to confine the plasma within a toroidal reaction vessel, with the magnetic fields keeping the plasma away from the walls of the vessel to prevent damage and unintended cooling of the plasma.[6]  

Examples of U.S. companies developing magnetic confinement systems are Commonwealth Fusion Systems, TAE Technologies, Tokamak Energy, Helion Energy, and Thea Energy. Inertial confinement uses high-power lasers or electrical discharges to compress a small capsule of fusion fuel to extreme temperatures and pressures for a short time. This approach is used, for example, in the National Ignition Facility at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. [7] Examples of U.S. companies developing inertial confinement systems are Xcimer Energy, Focused Energy, ZAP Energy, and Shine Technologies. In addition to these methods, several companies such as General Fusion,  are pursuing various other pathways to try to create and control fusion reactions, including a hybrid of both magnetic and inertial confinement approaches. [8]

Various fusion fuels are used to power these pursued pathways. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, once developed, first-generation fusion plants may likely use a combination of abundant deuterium and lithium as fuel. [9] Deuterium, lithium and tritium Deuterium-tritium is a highly studied fusion fuel and a likely basis for the first fusion power plants.[10] Lithium is a critical resource for fusion because of its material properties. Lithium is used to breed tritium, the key fuel for fusion. [11] The rare lithium-6 form of the metal, which makes up only 7.5 per cent of all naturally occurring lithium, is the most efficient for sustaining the fusion process. [12] Li-6 is banned in the U.S. because of the harmful mercury waste it generates. [13] So most fusion power concepts rely on “enriched” lithium, where the Li-6 content has been boosted. [14]

Several companies are investing in efforts aimed at commercializing fusion energy. [15] Many of these companies are startups that have raised over $100 million in the past few years. [16]  The global fusion energy market size is projected to reach $611.8 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 5.56% from 2025 to 2034. [17] 

Current State - Projections of the time to putting Fusion Energy on the Grid

As of October 2025, fusion reactors remain pre-commercial, with no system yet producing net energy. Fusion energy stakeholders provide varying timelines as to when fusion energy will become technically feasible as an energy source for the electrical grid and when it will become commercially viable.  Projections range from 10 years to several decades in the future. [18]   Some companies are claiming that they will achieve commercial fusion energy in the next few years[19] while other stakeholders and experts said fusion energy will take more than 20 years. The Fusion Industry Association reported that many commercial companies predict fusion industry will be commercially viable in the 2030’s time frame. [19] 

Source: The Global Fusion Industry in 2025—Fusion Industry Association

Other stakeholders and experts believe fusion energy might put electricity on the grid in 10 to 20 years, however, significant resources are required to do so.[20] The Figure below illustrates commercialization risks that fusion energy will face on the road to commercial deployment. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the aspirational timeline as shown is strongly dependent on the level of both public and private investments. [21]

Commercialization risks for fusion

Source. U.S. Department of Energy, Fusion Energy Strategy 2024

Download the Dawnbreaker® OTA Report

Click below to download a copy of the Dawnbreaker® OTA Report. 

DoD Transition Information Packet (TIP)®

The Transition Information Packet (TIP) is a market research report specifically developed for small businesses working with the Department of Defense.

Customized Market Research (CMR)®

Filling in the gaps in your commercialization strategy….

The CMR provides our team with the greatest flexibility in addressing gaps in the information you need to refine your commercialization strategy. Based strictly on secondary literature, the market researcher can look for information that will help you understand changes in government regulations, market dynamics, emerging solutions, sources of funding, points of contact and other challenges you pose. Based on the information gathered, a business strategist will add comments throughout regarding the implications of the information for your strategy.

LICA Licensee Analysis®

Who will take the best care of your baby?

You’ve done a great job with your R&D. You’ve been careful to protect your intellectual property – but those next steps to bring the product to market seem out of reach. There’s too much competition, scale up would be too expensive – so you’ve decided to license-out your intellectual property. The challenge before you is to find the best licensee to bring your baby to market. Let us help you. We will profile organizations that frequently cite your patents and dig deeper to determine their financial health, technology and market synergies, and experience with licensing-in.

Commercial Potential Assessment (CPA)

Be wary of big numbers!

You’ve done a great job with your R&D. You’ve been careful to protect your intellectual property – but those next steps to bring the product to market seem out of reach. There’s too much competition, scale up would be too expensive – so you’ve decided to license-out your intellectual property. The challenge before you is to find the best licensee to bring your baby to market. Let us help you. We will profile organizations that frequently cite your patents and dig deeper to determine their financial health, technology and market synergies, and experience with licensing-in.

Competitor Analysis

Your customers know your competitors! Do you?

Maybe you believe that you don’t have any competition, but your customers know better! Their needs are being addressed now – perhaps not as well, but if there is a need, someone is providing a solution. Learn about the competition and be prepared to differentiate your solution from that of others. Dawnbreaker’s competitor analysis contrasts your competition on specifications, performance and price. Armed with this information we can help you create a compelling value proposition.

Developing Network Contacts (DevNC)

When you need to reach out...

There are times when you need to reach out to others – whether you are looking for potential customers, potential partners, or potential investors. But who should you call…and how do you address your fear of contacting them. The DevNC is a unique market research tool designed to provide you with between 25 and 30 Points of Contact (PoC). With each POC, information is included that provides insight about the person’s role. Depending on their position, other information commonly included relates to their background, articles that they have written, conference presentations and other pertinent information. This type of information enables you to customize your correspondence. Contact information is also included  – typically LinkedIn, email and phone number.

We are in the process of updating the Energy Portal

Please check back soon for access to our updated Energy Portal.