Market Snapshot: Algal Production Systems & Aquaculture

Algae encompass a diverse group of organisms, including both macroalgae, such as kelp and nori, and microalgae, like spirulina and chlorella. Over 50,000 species of algae have been identified world-wide. All types of algae possess chlorophyll and play a crucial role in aquatic ecosystems, serving as the primary source of energy for aquatic organisms. The U.S. government has exhibited an interest in using algae for both nutrition/animal feed applications and for biofuels/bioproducts. In its most recent solicitation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) sought novel or innovative approaches for algal production systems to improve quality, development, and harvesting of algal biomass for use in aquaculture feed and human food. The main cultivation systems widely used for algae cultivation are open ponds, attached growth systems, and closed photobioreactors (PBRs). 

The aquaculture industry has demonstrated a growing interest in cultivating microalgae because of its rapid growth and high lipids content. Algae products like lipids (omega-3, omega-6, and omega-9), carotenoids, carrageenan, agar, algal protein, algal flour, and alginate can be extracted from algae to serve various end-use applications. Applications in the algae products market include food & beverages, nutraceuticals & dietary supplements, animal feed, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, and other applications.

The algae-based animal feed market is one part of the algae products market. The algae-based animal feed market is expected to grow to $6.6 billion by 2034 from the 2024 valuation of $4.5 billion, exhibiting a CAGR of 3.9%. This market includes microalgae and macroalgae for both animal feed and aquaculture feed products. The use of algae in animal and fish feed is becoming increasingly popular. By type and source, aquaculture and microalgae hold the dominant share of the market respectively. Over half of the fish on the market are raised in fish farms, where fish feed constitutes around 90% of the cost. Most of the fish feed currently used is derived from either wild fish or terrestrial agricultural products. Both sources present problems in sourcing. Microalgae biomass, on the other hand, has the potential to support sustainable aquaculture and a circular economy as an environmentally-friendly feed ingredient. However, the high cost of microalgae  production remains a barrier to aquaculture.

While algal biomass cultivation has significant market potential, especially as seen for fish feed, the USDA is searching for improved production systems. The main cultivation systems—open ponds, attached growth systems[1], and photobioreactors (PBRs)—have their own shortcomings and challenges. General barriers for mass cultivation include financial challenges (the cost of water and nutrients) the limitations on recycling, biomass loss due to biocontamination and pond crashes, as well as the energy costs associated with harvesting. While open ponds have lower capital costs, they yield lower overall production rates. A major challenge of open ponds is the sensitivity to pollutants. Thus, only a few species can be cultivated in these ponds for biomass production on a commercial scale. Another concern is the problem of evaporation in open systems, which require water replacement to maintain the optimum balance of suspended salts and water.

Enclosed photobioreactors offer several advantages over open systems, which include larger surface-to-volume ratio, reduced risk of contamination, smaller area requirements, and the ability to prevent evaporation. Vertical-column and tubular photobioreactors designs are the most used. However, photobioreactors are more costly: the construction and maintenance are ten times higher than open ponds. While photobioreactors can maintain higher biomass density, the significant cost difference makes photobioreactors uncompetitive for industrial-scale production of microalgae biomass. As a result, closed system photobioreactors are mainly used for higher value products. The development of new technologies, such as closed-loop photobioreactors and precision fermentation, are improving the cost effectiveness of algae biomass production. Such advances seek to address the concerns related to high production costs, but microalgae harvesting remains a challenge for commercial-scale biomass production.

Improved algal production systems would benefit various markets and industries beyond aquaculture, including biofuels/bioproducts, pharmaceuticals, and wastewater treatment. The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) has an Advanced Algal Systems program, which supports research and development (R&D) to lower the costs of producing algal biofuels and bioproducts. The Algae Biomass Organization (ABO) explains how algae-based systems have the opportunity to provide a sustainable solution to wastewater treatment, identifying Iowa-based Gross-Wen Technologies’ patented solution Revolving Algal Biofilm (RAB) treatment system, which utilizes an algae biofilm to treat wastewater.

[1] Open ponds and photobioreactors are the two systems predominantly used for algae growth related to animal and fish feed. Attached growth systems relate to algal biomass production for biofuel and wastewater treatment.

Share this article:

Email
X
LinkedIn

Click below to learn about our market research services

Stay in the Know with Dawnbreaker®

Receive valuable industry insights such as our Market Snapshots, SBIR/STTR & TABA updates, & webinar announcements.

Fusion Energy Overview

Fusion is a potential energy source and occurs when one or more lighter elements combine to form a heavier element, releasing energy in the process. [1] Devices designed to harness this energy are known as fusion reactors. [2]   A future fusion plant could use the heat produced by the fusion reaction to produce steam to drive turbines or generators that produce electricity. [3] For almost a century, scientists around the globe have been looking to recreate and harness the power of fusion energy. [4]  

Tokamak
Source: ITER

There are two commonly pursued technologies to create and control plasma. Magnetic confinement uses strong magnets to contain plasma. A widely used configuration known as a tokamak[5] uses powerful magnets to confine the plasma within a toroidal reaction vessel, with the magnetic fields keeping the plasma away from the walls of the vessel to prevent damage and unintended cooling of the plasma.[6]  

Examples of U.S. companies developing magnetic confinement systems are Commonwealth Fusion Systems, TAE Technologies, Tokamak Energy, Helion Energy, and Thea Energy. Inertial confinement uses high-power lasers or electrical discharges to compress a small capsule of fusion fuel to extreme temperatures and pressures for a short time. This approach is used, for example, in the National Ignition Facility at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. [7] Examples of U.S. companies developing inertial confinement systems are Xcimer Energy, Focused Energy, ZAP Energy, and Shine Technologies. In addition to these methods, several companies such as General Fusion,  are pursuing various other pathways to try to create and control fusion reactions, including a hybrid of both magnetic and inertial confinement approaches. [8]

Various fusion fuels are used to power these pursued pathways. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, once developed, first-generation fusion plants may likely use a combination of abundant deuterium and lithium as fuel. [9] Deuterium, lithium and tritium Deuterium-tritium is a highly studied fusion fuel and a likely basis for the first fusion power plants.[10] Lithium is a critical resource for fusion because of its material properties. Lithium is used to breed tritium, the key fuel for fusion. [11] The rare lithium-6 form of the metal, which makes up only 7.5 per cent of all naturally occurring lithium, is the most efficient for sustaining the fusion process. [12] Li-6 is banned in the U.S. because of the harmful mercury waste it generates. [13] So most fusion power concepts rely on “enriched” lithium, where the Li-6 content has been boosted. [14]

Several companies are investing in efforts aimed at commercializing fusion energy. [15] Many of these companies are startups that have raised over $100 million in the past few years. [16]  The global fusion energy market size is projected to reach $611.8 billion by 2034, expanding at a CAGR of 5.56% from 2025 to 2034. [17] 

Current State - Projections of the time to putting Fusion Energy on the Grid

As of October 2025, fusion reactors remain pre-commercial, with no system yet producing net energy. Fusion energy stakeholders provide varying timelines as to when fusion energy will become technically feasible as an energy source for the electrical grid and when it will become commercially viable.  Projections range from 10 years to several decades in the future. [18]   Some companies are claiming that they will achieve commercial fusion energy in the next few years[19] while other stakeholders and experts said fusion energy will take more than 20 years. The Fusion Industry Association reported that many commercial companies predict fusion industry will be commercially viable in the 2030’s time frame. [19] 

Source: The Global Fusion Industry in 2025—Fusion Industry Association

Other stakeholders and experts believe fusion energy might put electricity on the grid in 10 to 20 years, however, significant resources are required to do so.[20] The Figure below illustrates commercialization risks that fusion energy will face on the road to commercial deployment. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the aspirational timeline as shown is strongly dependent on the level of both public and private investments. [21]

Commercialization risks for fusion

Source. U.S. Department of Energy, Fusion Energy Strategy 2024

Download the Dawnbreaker® OTA Report

Click below to download a copy of the Dawnbreaker® OTA Report. 

DoD Transition Information Packet (TIP)®

The Transition Information Packet (TIP) is a market research report specifically developed for small businesses working with the Department of Defense.

Customized Market Research (CMR)®

Filling in the gaps in your commercialization strategy….

The CMR provides our team with the greatest flexibility in addressing gaps in the information you need to refine your commercialization strategy. Based strictly on secondary literature, the market researcher can look for information that will help you understand changes in government regulations, market dynamics, emerging solutions, sources of funding, points of contact and other challenges you pose. Based on the information gathered, a business strategist will add comments throughout regarding the implications of the information for your strategy.

LICA Licensee Analysis®

Who will take the best care of your baby?

You’ve done a great job with your R&D. You’ve been careful to protect your intellectual property – but those next steps to bring the product to market seem out of reach. There’s too much competition, scale up would be too expensive – so you’ve decided to license-out your intellectual property. The challenge before you is to find the best licensee to bring your baby to market. Let us help you. We will profile organizations that frequently cite your patents and dig deeper to determine their financial health, technology and market synergies, and experience with licensing-in.

Commercial Potential Assessment (CPA)

Be wary of big numbers!

You’ve done a great job with your R&D. You’ve been careful to protect your intellectual property – but those next steps to bring the product to market seem out of reach. There’s too much competition, scale up would be too expensive – so you’ve decided to license-out your intellectual property. The challenge before you is to find the best licensee to bring your baby to market. Let us help you. We will profile organizations that frequently cite your patents and dig deeper to determine their financial health, technology and market synergies, and experience with licensing-in.

Competitor Analysis

Your customers know your competitors! Do you?

Maybe you believe that you don’t have any competition, but your customers know better! Their needs are being addressed now – perhaps not as well, but if there is a need, someone is providing a solution. Learn about the competition and be prepared to differentiate your solution from that of others. Dawnbreaker’s competitor analysis contrasts your competition on specifications, performance and price. Armed with this information we can help you create a compelling value proposition.

Developing Network Contacts (DevNC)

When you need to reach out...

There are times when you need to reach out to others – whether you are looking for potential customers, potential partners, or potential investors. But who should you call…and how do you address your fear of contacting them. The DevNC is a unique market research tool designed to provide you with between 25 and 30 Points of Contact (PoC). With each POC, information is included that provides insight about the person’s role. Depending on their position, other information commonly included relates to their background, articles that they have written, conference presentations and other pertinent information. This type of information enables you to customize your correspondence. Contact information is also included  – typically LinkedIn, email and phone number.

We are in the process of updating the Energy Portal

Please check back soon for access to our updated Energy Portal.